ArticleScientific reports2025
Urinary microbiomes in postmenopausal women with or without urinary symptoms of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Urogenital Microbiome-Metabolic Interface in Postmenopausal Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: Estrogen Deficiency, Diabetes, Obesity, and Microbial Reservoirs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Urinary Microbiome Characteristics in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Their Clinical Implications: A Narrative Review.Annals of transplantation · 2026Review
- Multi-site microbiota crosstalk in the postmenopausal: from dysbiosis mechanisms to precision interventions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some postmenopausal women suffer from genital and urinary symptoms, while others do not. Therefore, the hypoestrogenic status cannot entirely explain the occurrence of the genitourinary syndrome in menopause (GSM). Differences in the urinary microbiome might play a role in bladder function and vulnerability to urinary symptoms. This study aimed to compare characterization urinary microbiome in postmenopausal women who experienced GSM with urinary symptoms with that in those without urinary symptoms. Forty participants were screened for genital symptoms of GSM and then divided into the urinary symptoms group and the non-urinary symptoms group on the basis of a validated questionnaire. 16 S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to investigate microbial diversity. The alpha diversity was used to evaluate the species richness and evenness, while the beta diversity was used to estimate the differences in the urinary microbiome between the groups. Differential abundance analysis was used to investigate biomarkers in the groups by linear discriminant analysis effect size. The relationship between the urinary microbiome and urinary symptoms was assessed using Spearman's correlation analysis. The characteristics of the participants were not different between the groups. Gardnerella was found in 22.2% (4/18) and 11.1% (2/18) of participants in the urinary symptoms group and in the non-urinary symptoms group, respectively (p > 0.05). Alpha diversity was less in the urinary symptoms group than in the non-urinary symptoms group, but this was not significant. Beta diversity of the urinary microbiome was not significantly different between the two groups. A differential abundance analysis showed that the genus Prevotella was significantly dominant in postmenopausal women with GSM who reported urinary symptoms. Prevotella was marginally correlated with voiding symptoms (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.