ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of XGBoost and logistic regression for predicting sarcopenia in postsurgical gastric cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting postoperative survival in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Ipilimumab and nivolumab for cancer treatment: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Impact of IgG monitoring and machine learning based prediction on outcomes of ABO incompatible kidney transplantation in blood type O recipients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adiposity-lipid-glycemic clusters as potential warning signals of bone mass reduction in Asia's largest urban communities - based bone health assessment via ultrasound.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Muscle-Driven prognostication in gastric cancer: A multicenter deep learning framework integrating Iliopsoas and erector spinae radiomics for 5-Year survival prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Methodological Review of Classification Trees for Risk Stratification: An Application Example in the Obesity Paradox.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Towards Precision in Sarcopenia Assessment: The Challenges of Multimodal Data Analysis in the Era of AI.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the efficacy of vidian neurectomy in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps combined with allergic rhinitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly XGBoost and logistic regression, to predict sarcopenia among postsurgical gastric cancer patients has gained significant attention in recent research. Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is a serious concern in these patients due to its association with poor postoperative outcomes, including increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, machine learning was used to establish a risk prediction model for sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy to facilitate early intervention and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary comprehensive hospital in Nanjing (China) from January 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively included in this study, and their clinical and follow-up data were collected. The XGBoost model and multivariate logistic regression analysis model were used to screen the factors related to postoperative outcomes, and the results of the two models were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the predictive value of the XGBoost model. The SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was used to explain the XGBoost model and determine the impact of features on the prediction model. A total of 231 postoperative gastric cancer patients were included in this study, of whom 128 (55.4%) developed sarcopenia. The results of the univariate analysis and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression were cross-validated, and 5 key study variables were ultimately determined: serum albumin, comorbid diabetes, operation style, nutritional score, and ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status score. The XGBoost model has slightly better AUC (0.987, 95% CI: 0.976-0.998) than the logistic regression model (0.918, 95% CI: 0.873-0.963) in the training set. The SHAP analysis showed that in the XGBoost model, diabetes, nutritional score, and serum albumin have a greater impact on the sarcopenia risk prediction after gastric cancer surgery, especially the impact of diabetes and nutritional score is the most significant, followed by the ECOG performance status score, and operation style has the least impact. In summary, the machine learning-based sarcopenia prediction model constructed in this study provides a valuable decision support tool for clinical screening and intervention of sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.