ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Global trends and insights of telesurgery research: a bibliometric analysis of publications since the 21st century.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telesurgery and remote surgery research: a bibliometric analysis of scientific growth, collaboration, and thematic evolution.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in robotic, teleoperated, and remote surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Tracing the global expansion of telesurgery research: a bibliometric exploration of 94 countries and six continents.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- [Pioneering Application of a Domestically Developed Single-Arm Single-Port Robotic System in Ultra-Remote Telesurgery: A Clinical Report of Two Gynecological Oncology Cases].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, telesurgery has shown a rapid development trend as an innovative surgical technique, and been applied to the clinical treatment of various tumor diseases. However, the current research on telesurgery is still relatively fragmented, lacking a systematic summary of its development and future directions. Addressing these limitations is crucial for advancing the application of this novel surgical technology.
methodsThis bibliometric study of publications related to telesurgery that were indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2000 to 2024. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrix were used to analyze and visually represent the gathered data, and the relevant content was presented according to the BIBLIO guidelines.
resultsWe researched 565 publications across 269 journals authored by 2422 individuals affiliated with 917 institutions spanning 62 countries. Notably, the United States leads in the number of publications, with China also making noteworthy contributions. Kyushu University and the University of Washington emerge as prominent institutions in terms of research output within this domain. Analysis of document co-occurrence and co-citation reveals that Jacques Marescaux from France holds the top position globally among authors and wields significant influence in this field. Keyword analysis indicates that key future research directions in this area include mitigating latency issues in telesurgery, integrating advanced network communication technologies, and enhancing the performance of telesurgical robots. Furthermore, ethical and legal issues associated with telesurgery may emerge as critical challenges to be addressed for its further expansion and application.
conclusionThis research provides an overview of telesurgery research findings, encompassing the evolution of research priorities in telesurgery. The study anticipates that the secure implementation and broader adoption of telesurgery will bring more benefits to patients on a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40229598What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.