SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Correlation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance levels during pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a major class of contaminants in recent years. Pregnant women are more susceptible to the influence of these compounds, which could heighten the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aims to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the correlation between PFAS exposure during pregnancy and the risk of developing GDM and delve into their dose-response relationship.
methodsPubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Data were statistically analyzed using Stata 15.0. Fixed-effects (FEM) or random-effects (REM) models were used to combine STD mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to heterogeneity. Dose-response meta-analyses were performed when applicable.
resultsA total of 12 papers were included in this study. Meta-analysis results indicated significantly higher levels of PFOA, PFBS, and PFUnDA in GDM patients compared to healthy pregnant women. Pregnant women exposed to high levels of PFOA and PFBS had a significantly increased risk of developing GDM, with ORs of 1.513 and 1.436, respectively. Dose-response analyses indicated that for each 1 ng/ml increase in PFOA and PFBS exposure, the risk of GDM increased by 0.3% and 11.7%, respectively. In contrast, no significant associations were observed between high exposure to other PFAS compounds, such as PFNA, PFHxS, and PFOS, and the development of GDM. Subgroup analyses suggested that PFOA, PFBS, and PFOS levels were higher in GDM patients from China compared to those from Western countries. The differences in PFOA and PFOS levels between GDM and normal pregnant women were more pronounced during late pregnancy.
conclusionExposure to PFOA, PFBS, and PFUnDA during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of GDM. Given the elevated risk, particularly in the Chinese population, it is crucial to reduce exposure to these substances, especially from the preconception period onward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.