ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Classification of schizophrenia spectrum disorder using machine learning and functional connectivity: reconsidering the clinical application.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) is crucial for effective intervention and prognosis improvement. Previous neuroimaging-based classifications have primarily focused on chronic, medicated SSD cohorts. However, the question remains whether brain metrics identified in these populations can serve as trait biomarkers for early-stage SSD. This study investigates whether functional connectivity features identified in chronic, medicated SSD patients could be generalized to early-stage SSD.
methodsData were collected from 502 SSD patients and 575 healthy controls (HCs) across four medical institutions. Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) features were used to train a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier on individuals with medicated chronic SSD and HCs from three sites. The remaining site, comprising both chronic medicated and first-episode unmedicated SSD patients, was used for independent validation. A univariable analysis examined the association between medication dosage or illness duration and FC.
resultsThe classifier achieved 69% accuracy (p = 0.002), 63% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 0.75 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 69% F1-score, 72% positive predictive rate, and 67% negative predictive rate, when tested on an independent dataset. Subgroup analysis showed 71% sensitivity (p = 0.04) for chronic medicated SSD, but poor generalization to first-episode unmedicated SSD (sensitivity = 48%, p = 0.44). Univariable analysis revealed a significant association between FC and medication usage, but not disease duration.
conclusionsClassifiers developed on chronic medicated SSD may predominantly capture state features of chronicity and medication, overshadowing potential SSD traits. This partially explains the current classifiers' non-generalizability across SSD patients with different clinical states, underscoring the need for models that can enhance the early detection of schizophrenia neural pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.