Observational studyVascular health and risk management2025
Safety and Efficacy of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Symptomatic Patients with Long Superficial Femoral Artery Disease.
Observational study in Vascular health and risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical performance of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions may depend on the specific device used. There is limited evidence on the clinical safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-coated device Stellarex Methods: This is a single arm, prospective, open label, observational study including symptomatic patients with long femoro-popliteal lesions undergoing endovascular revascularization with Stellarex Results: Ninety-five patients (median age 72, lesion length 250 mm) were included. At 6 months after the procedure, 61% of patients were asymptomatic as defined by the Rutherford classification, decreasing over time (57% at 12 months, 56% at 24 months, 44% at 36 months). Walking Impairment Questionnaire showed a remarkable improvement at 6 months, with a decreasing trend over time. When single components were analysed, better performances were observed for distance and climbing scores throughout the study period, while speed returned to baseline levels after 24 months. EQ5D Questionnaire showed a statistically significant improvement throughout the study period (with a decreasing trend over time, as seen for Rutherford classification and Walking Impairment Questionnaire). During the 36-months follow-up, 9% of patients died, with previous limb amputation being an independent predictor of mortality (HR = 7.4, p = 0.013). One-year primary patency was 76.5%, with no significant difference compared to the reference rate of 80% (p = 0.810). Primary patency defined as PSVR ≤2.4 (peak systolic velocity ratio) was maintained over time (median survival time free from PSVR >2.4 was not assessable as it exceeded the 36 months of follow-up). Conclusion: In our sample, Stellarex showed to be safe and effective and it was associated with an event rate comparable to other devices reported in literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.