Evidence mapPaperPMID 40230673Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.

Arya Aminorroaya, Dhruva Biswas, Aline F Pedroso, Rohan Khera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arya AminorroayaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Dhruva BiswasSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Aline F PedrosoSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Rohan KheraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) serves as a powerful tool that can revolutionize how personalized, patient-focused care is provided within interventional cardiology. Specifically, AI can augment clinical care across the spectrum for acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease, with applications in coronary and structural heart interventions. This has been enabled by the potential of AI to harness various types of health data. We review how AI-driven technologies can advance diagnosis, preprocedural planning, intraprocedural guidance, and prognostication in interventional cardiology. AI automates clinical tasks, increases efficiency, improves reliability and accuracy, and individualizes clinical care, establishing its potential to transform care. Furthermore, AI-enabled, community-based screening programs are yet to be implemented to leverage the full potential of AI to improve patient outcomes. However, to transform clinical practice, AI tools require robust and transparent development processes, consistent performance across various settings and populations, positive impact on clinical and care quality outcomes, and seamless integration into clinical workflows. Once these are established, AI can reshape interventional cardiology, improving precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceinterventional cardiologypercutaneous coronary interventionstructural heart intervention

Identifiers

PMID40230673
PMCPMC11993883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.