Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230867›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Exploring Bird Gut Microbiota Through Opportunistic Fecal Sampling: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives.

Laura Fablet, Aurélie Bonin, Diane Zarzoso-Lacoste, Vincent Dubut, Laurence Walch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura FabletSorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE Université Paris Est Créteil, Université Paris Cité, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences (IEES-Paris) Paris France.
Aurélie BoninARGALY Sainte Hélène du Lac France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7800-8609
Diane Zarzoso-LacosteUMR CNRS 7058 Ecologie et Dynamique Des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN) Université de Picardie Jules Verne Amiens France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-4453
Vincent DubutAix Marseille Univ Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE Marseille France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-6909
Laurence WalchSorbonne Université, CNRS, IRD, INRAE Université Paris Est Créteil, Université Paris Cité, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences (IEES-Paris) Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3093-731X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wetland ecosystems are facing alarming rates of destruction and degradation, posing significant challenges for avian populations reliant on these habitats. Bird health is closely linked to the composition of their intestinal microbiota, which is primarily influenced by local conditions, primarily through diet. Building on our previous work identifying dietary variations among bird populations in marshes within a Ramsar site along the Somme and Avre rivers (France), this pilot study aimed to assess the relevance of using fecal samples collected from the ground to characterize avian intestinal microbiota via 16S rRNA metabarcoding. We hypothesized that this noninvasive sampling method would capture how bird traits and environmental factors shape fecal microbiota composition. Sampling was conducted during the breeding season at seven locations (six within the Ramsar site and one on its outskirts) spanning rural or peri-urban environments. A total of 52 fecal samples from nine bird species or families, predominantly waterbirds, were analyzed for bacterial composition. At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were predominant, with the relative abundance of genera such as

Indexed as

avian healthbacterial compositionbird communitiesfreshwater ecosystemsmolecular ecology

Identifiers

PMID40230867
PMCPMC11995298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.