ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS): retrospective monocentric analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment strategies.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real World Data and Its Impact on the Management of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- [Immune complex- and complement-mediated glomerulonephritides].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) is a group of rare disorders in which monoclonal proteins cause kidney damage. Due to its rarity, ongoing research is vital to refine diagnostics, enhance treatment, and improve outcomes. This retrospective study analyzed 34 patients with renal biopsy-proven MGRS-defining lesions. Patients were divided into two subgroups: kidney-limited AL amyloidosis (MGRS-A, 44%, n = 15) and other MGRS (MGRS-NA, 56%, n = 19). Key outcomes included progression-free survival and overall survival. Baseline characteristics such as histopathology, plasma cell percentage, kidney function, and proteinuria were documented alongside initial treatments, and hematologic and renal response. Distinct differences were observed between the two groups: MGRS-NA was primarily associated with glomerular lesions, while MGRS-A exhibited broader kidney involvement. Treatment varied: bortezomib for plasma cell-driven cases and rituximab for B-cell-related conditions. Anemia was the most common side effect (71%), associated with treatment intensity. Despite similar overall survival outcomes, MGRS-A followed a more aggressive course, with a shorter time from diagnosis to death (206 vs. 728 days). Renal and hematologic responses were comparable between the groups, although baseline factors such as hemoglobin and CRP levels were predictive of mortality. These findings underscore the need for more precise characterization and standardized criteria to optimize the management of MGRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.