ArticleJCO oncology practice2025
Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs Health Care System In-Person and National TeleOncology Service-Delivered Care.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Veterans Affairs Health Administration (VA) has experience using telehealth (TH) to deliver care to 10 million enrolled Veterans for many clinical care needs. The VA National TeleOncology Service (NTO) was established in 2020 to provide specialized cancer services regardless of geography. We sought to compare quality in TH-delivered cancer services with traditional (TR) in-person VA care.
methodsUsing electronic health record data, we identified patients with an International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic code for an incident malignancy from December 2016 to March 2021 at early adopting sites providing both TR and TH care. We classified patients as TH users if they received TH services at least once for their cancer care. We gathered demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics to calculate 25 Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) measures in the symptoms and toxicity management (two), end of life and palliative care (10), and core measure domains (13). We report disease-specific measures, QOPI measures descriptively, and performed chi-square tests to compare TH and TR.
resultsWe identified 972 patients with lymphoma, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer. In all, 427 (44%) were TH users. Patients were predominately White (n = 819, 84.3%) men (n = 930, 95.7%). Across 25 QOPI measures, TH users received better (n = 12), worse (n = 10), the same (n = 2), and unevaluable (n = 1) descriptive performance. Appropriate tobacco cessation support within the previous year was higher in TH (85.3%
conclusionVA is a leader in TH cancer care because of both its volume and quality. VA-provided TH cancer care quality is similar to or better than that of TR in-person care. NTO specifically, and VA teleoncology broadly, provides another option to Veterans for cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.