ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Intracardiac Echocardiography Versus Fluoroscopy During Left-Sided Accessory Pathway Ablation in Children and Young Adults: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been well established for use in catheter ablation of arrhythmias and offers direct visualization of atrial septum and left-sided structures in adults. There, however, is a dearth of data in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of left-sided accessory pathway catheter ablation in children and young adults where ICE was used in addition to 3-dimensional (3D)/traditional mapping and to compare outcomes in catheter ablations where only traditional fluoroscopy was used in addition to 3D/traditional mapping. The results of this study showed that the use of ICE showed no significant differences in major adverse events when compared to traditional fluoroscopy. In conclusion, ICE is an effective and safe modality to use in left-sided accessory pathway ablation in pediatric populations, but further large-scale studies and cost-benefit analysis are needed to determine its practical usage compared to traditional fluoroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40234259What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.