ArticleNature communications2025
Heterogeneity-preserving discriminative feature selection for disease-specific subtype discovery.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical subtyping of severe acute pancreatitis reveals heterogeneous associations with early management strategies: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- AI-Guided Binding Mechanisms and Molecular Dynamics for MERS-CoV.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Diffraction-informed deep learning for molecular-specific holograms of breast cancer cells.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disease-specific subtype identification can deepen our understanding of disease progression and pave the way for personalized therapies, given the complexity of disease heterogeneity. Large-scale transcriptomic, proteomic, and imaging datasets create opportunities for discovering subtypes but also pose challenges due to their high dimensionality. To mitigate this, many feature selection methods focus on selecting features that distinguish known diseases or cell states, yet often miss features that preserve heterogeneity and reveal new subtypes. To overcome this gap, we develop Preserving Heterogeneity (PHet), a statistical methodology that employs iterative subsampling and differential analysis of interquartile range, in conjunction with Fisher's method, to identify a small set of features that enhance subtype clustering quality. Here, we show that this method can maintain sample heterogeneity while distinguishing known disease/cell states, with a tendency to outperform previous differential expression and outlier-based methods, indicating its potential to advance our understanding of disease mechanisms and cell differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.