ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
A coregulatory influence map of glioblastoma heterogeneity and plasticity.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present GBM-cRegMap, an online resource providing a comprehensive coregulatory influence network perspective on glioblastoma (GBM) heterogeneity and plasticity. Using representation learning algorithms, we derived two components of this resource: GBM-CoRegNet, a highly specific coregulatory network of tumor cells, and GBM-CoRegMap, a unified network influence map based on 1612 tumors from 16 studies. As a widely applicable closed-loop system connecting cellular models and tumors, GBM-cRegMap will provide the GBM research community with an easy-to-use web tool ( https://gbm.cregmap.com ) that maps any existing or newly generated transcriptomic "query" data to a reference coregulatory network and a large-scale manifold of disease heterogeneity. Using GBM-cRegMap, we demonstrated the synergy between the two components by refining the molecular classification of GBM, identifying potential key regulators, and aligning the transcriptional profiles of tumors and in vitro models. Through the amalgamation of a vast dataset, we validated the proneural (PN)-mesenchymal (MES) axis and identified three subclasses of classical (CL) tumors: astrocyte-like (CL-A), epithelial basal-like (CL-B), and cilium-rich (CL-C). We revealed the CL-C subclass, an intermediate state demonstrating the plasticity of GBM cells along the PN-MES axis under chemotherapy. We identified key regulators, such as PAX8, and NKX2.5, potentially involved in temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. Notably, NKX2.5, more expressed in higher-grade gliomas, negatively impacts patient survival, and regulates genes involved in glucose metabolism.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.