ArticleScientific reports2025
Uncovering genomic diversity and signatures of selection in red Angus × Chinese red steppe crossbred cattle population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A comparative study of runs of homozygosity islands common among 12 Australian beef cattle breeds.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Bovine Genome Database: new curated collection of selective sweeps in bovine populations across the world.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Inbreeding patterns and genetic diversity under selection in Teha sheep.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crossbreeding is a cornerstone of modern livestock improvement, combining desirable traits to enhance productivity and environmental resilience. This study conducts the first comprehensive genomic analysis of Red Angus × Chinese Red Steppe (RACS) crossbred cattle, evaluating their genetic architecture, diversity, and selection signatures relative to founder breeds (Red Angus and Chinese Red Steppe) and global populations. A total of 119 cattle, comprising 104 RACS crossbreds and 15 Chinese Red Steppes cattle, were genotyped using the GGP Bovine 100k SNP array. Additionally, the public available genotypic data generated using the BovineSNP50 chip from 550 animals across eight beef breeds (Angus, Hereford, Limousin, Charolais, Mongolian, Shorthorn, Red Angus, and Simmental) and one dairy breed (Holstein) were incorporated into the analysis. We aimed to (1) define the population structure of RACS cattle, (2) quantify their genomic diversity and inbreeding levels, and (3) pinpoint regions under selection linked to adaptive and economic traits. We employed runs of homozygosity (ROH) and population differentiation (Fst) analyses to detect selection signals. The results revealed that the crossbred (RACS), Angus, and Red Angus breeds exhibited similar clustering patterns in principal component analysis (PCA), but the crossbred population showed the highest nucleotide diversity and lowest inbreeding coefficients compared to other breeds. Notably, candidate regions associated with immune response, cold adaptation, and carcass traits were identified within the RACS population. These findings enhance our understanding of the genetic makeup of crossbred beef cattle and highlight their potential for genetic improvement, informing future selection and breeding strategies aimed at optimizing beef production in challenging environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.