Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235185›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Widening Patient Engagement for Rare Disease Drug Trials: The Perspectives of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Participating in Clinical Drug Trials and Drug Trial Design.

Julia Frost, Widening Engagement Patient Advisory Group, Jessica Mandizha, Steve Jones, Chantal van den Dungen, Lauren Asare, Catherine Pope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Can the Development of Orphan Drugs Include Wider Patient Engagement? A Citizens' Jury to Explore a Promissory Notion.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia FrostHealth and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-5911
Widening Engagement Patient Advisory GroupHealth and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.
Jessica MandizhaRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Wonford), Exeter, UK.
Steve JonesAction for Pulmonary Fibrosis, Peterborough, UK.
Chantal van den DungenChargée des relations internationals, ABFFP association belge francophone contre la fibrose pulmonaire, Rebecq, Belgium.
Lauren AsarePatient and Public Involvement, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.
Catherine PopeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702

Funding

This research was funded by the Medical Research Council (Grant Ref. MR/W003732/1).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch about patient engagement for people with rare diseases has identified how the experiences of some members of the public are overlooked in relation to clinical trial design and trial participation. As part of a knowledge transfer partnership (KTP), the authors were granted access to patient insight reports about the needs of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), to inform clinical trial design and marketing strategy. These were contrasted with data from qualitative interviews, informed by and collected from people with IPF and the clinical staff who recruit them to trials.

objectiveTo identify patient and professional perspectives for IPF drug trials to create opportunities for innovation in patient engagement.

designEthnography. Qualitative researcher embedded in a pharmaceutical organisation. SETTING AND

participantsInternational patient insight reports to inform a clinical trial protocol (n = 1) and marketing strategy (n = 6), including the experiences of over 100 patients with IPF. In the United Kingdom, interviews with patients with IPF (n = 32) and the staff who support them clinically and recruit them to trials of new medicines (n = 19) at one specialist interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre.

resultsMethodological practices inherent in inpatient insight reports ensured the perspectives of some people with IPF were overlooked. Interviews with a more marginalised population of people with IPF, and the staff who support them, identified that some found trial information confusing, trial practices frustrating and the opportunities to engage in trial design absent. DISCUSSION: Current pharmaceutical practices of working with contract research organisations and patient organisations exclude the perspectives of patients with IPF who do not engage with either. Trial recruitment information needs to be tailored to the needs of individuals, and trial processes need to enable a wider group of patients to participate.

conclusionsPeople with IPF want the opportunity to participate in drug trials and trial science. However, methodological rigour and deliberative practices are required to enable a wider group of patients to have a stake in the design and conduct of drug trials for rare diseases. The challenge now is for regulators to mandate such inclusive practices and for pharmaceutical organisations to adopt them. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A Patient Advisory Group (PAG) comprising six people with IPF gave input on the research protocol and then on the scope and content of the ongoing research. Two patients from international patient organisations served as a Steering Group (SG). Members of these groups provided their interpretations of the study findings and gave insight on their experiences in clinical design and participation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPatient ParticipationRare DiseasesAgedAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResearch DesignUnited Kingdomidiopathic pulmonary fibrosismarket accesspatient engagementqualitative researchrandomised controlled trialsrare diseases

Identifiers

PMID40235185
PMCPMC12000536

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.