Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40235543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Exploring the impact of cuproptosis on prostate cancer prognosis

Junchao Wu, Wentian Wu, Jiaxuan Qin, Ziqi Chen, Rongfang Zhong, Peng Guo, Song Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junchao Wu *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wentian Wu *Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jiaxuan Qin *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ziqi ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Rongfang ZhongDepartment of Urology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Peng GuoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, China.
Song FanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cuproptosis, along with RNA methylation regulators, has recently come to the fore as innovative mechanisms governing cell death, exerting profound impact on the onset and progression of multiple cancers. Nonetheless, the prognostic implications and underlying regulatory mechanisms of them associated with prostate cancer (PCa) remain to be thoroughly investigated. Methods: Genomic and clinical data for PCa from The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets were analyzed to identify a prognostic model through univariate and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox regression analyses that were validated utilizing external datasets. We used receiver operating characteristic curves and C-index to evaluate the accuracy of our prognostic model. In conjunction with this, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analyses to investigate underlying mechanisms and evaluate the degree of immune infiltration, as well as to assess patients' responses to diverse chemotherapy agents. Especially, qPCR assay was utilized to unveil the expression of signature genes in PCa. Results: We meticulously selected six Cuproptosis-Associated RNA Methylation Regulators (CARMRs) to establish a risk prognosis model, which was further verified to obtain enhanced predictive capacity in external validation cohorts. Insights from immune infiltration and scRNA-seq analyses have elucidated the immune characteristics of PCa, and highlighted the immunosuppressive role of regulatory T cells on immune response. Additionally, drug susceptibility analysis demonstrated that patients with PCa in the low-risk category derived better benefit from bicalutamide treatment, whereas those in the high-risk group exhibited a favor response to adriamycin and docetaxel treatments. The qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining assays also reveal the a dramatically altered expression pattern of TRDMT1 and ALYREF in PCa tissues. Conclusion: In general, we established a model involving CARMRs that can better predict the risk of recurrence of PCa and have identified the possible mechanisms affecting PCa progression, thereby promoting further research in this field.

Indexed as

chemotherapy agentcuproptosisimmunotherapyprostate cancerRNA methylation regulators

Identifiers

PMID40235543
PMCPMC11996820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.