Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40236038›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Individual differences in sequential decision-making.

Mojtaba Abbaszadeh, Erica Ozanick, Noa Magen, David Darrow, Xinyuan Yan, Nicola Grissom, Alexander B Herman, Becket R Ebitz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mojtaba AbbaszadehDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1J4.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-8962
Erica OzanickDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1J4.
Noa MagenDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1J4.
David DarrowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-9335-0584
Xinyuan YanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 55455.
Nicola GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-8130
Alexander B HermanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 55455.ORCID 0000-0001-6229-433X
Becket R EbitzDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1J4.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-9502

Funding

Neural Basis of Effortful Decision MakingK23DA050909 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMAN, ALEXANDER · 2021 to 2025
$931k
Computational dissociation of the causes of cognitive rigidity in depressionR21MH127607 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMAN, ALEXANDER · 2022 to 2023
$423k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA050909NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH127607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People differ widely in how they make decisions in uncertain environments. While many studies leverage this variability to measure differences in specific cognitive processes and parameters, the key dimension(s) of individual variability in uncertain decision-making tasks has not been identified. Here, we analyzed behavioral data from 1001 participants performing a restless three-armed bandit task, where reward probabilities fluctuated unpredictably over time. Using a novel analytical approach that controlled for the stochasticity in this tasks, we identified a dominant nonlinear axis of individual variability. We found that this primary axis of variability was strongly and selectively correlated with the probability of exploration, as inferred by latent state modeling. This suggests that the major factor shaping individual differences in bandit task performance is the tendency to explore (versus exploit), rather than personality characteristics, reinforcement learning model parameters, or low-level strategies. Certain demographic characteristics also predicted variance along this principle axis: participants at the exploratory end tended to be younger than participants at the exploitative end, and self-identified men were overrepresented at both extremes. Together, these findings offer a principled framework for understanding individual differences in task behavior while highlighting the cognitive and demographic factors that shape individual differences in decision-making under uncertainty.

Identifiers

PMID40236038
PMCPMC11996512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.