ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Pregnancy-Dependent Cardioprotection via GPER Activation in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that affects multiple organs, including the heart, increasing long-term cardiovascular risks for both the mother and offspring. While the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) has cardioprotective effects, its role in pregnancy-associated cardiac dysfunction, particularly in chronic hypertension, remains unclear, given the significant physiological adaptations that occur during pregnancy, including hormonal fluctuations and hemodynamic changes. This study investigated whether LNS8801, a selective and orally bioavailable GPER agonist, could improve cardiac function in virgin and pregnant Dahl salt-sensitive (SS/Jr) rats, a model of chronic hypertension exacerbated by pregnancy. Methods: Female Dahl SS/Jr rats, both virgin and pregnant, were randomized into four groups: Virgin + Vehicle, Virgin + LNS8801, Pregnant + Vehicle, and Pregnant + LNS8801. LNS8801 (800 µg/kg/day, given orally) was administered in pregnant rats from gestational day (GD) 9 to 20 and for an equivalent period in virgin controls. Cardiac function was assessed via echocardiography, including speckle-tracking strain analysis and conventional systolic and diastolic parameters. Mean arterial pressure and proteinuria were also measured. Results: LNS8801 significantly improved cardiac function in pregnant Dahl SS/Jr rats, enhancing global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain, as well as increasing systolic function. Additionally, LNS8801 enhanced diastolic function, improving left ventricular compliance (E/A ratio) and early mitral annular velocity (e'), while reducing left ventricular filling pressures (E/e' ratio). In contrast, LNS8801 had no significant effects on cardiac function and blood pressure in virgin Dahl SS/Jr rats, suggesting that pregnancy-related adaptations may enhance GPER-mediated cardioprotection. LNS8801 treatment significantly reduced proteinuria in both virgin and pregnant rats, indicating a pregnancy-independent renal protective effect. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of pregnancy-specific adaptations in shaping the cardiovascular effects of GPER activation. While LNS8801 demonstrated cardioprotective and antihypertensive benefits in pregnant Dahl SS/Jr rats, its effects were absent in virgin animals, underscoring the influence of the physiological and hormonal environment on GPER-mediated responses. These findings provide a foundation for further exploration of GPER as a therapeutic target for pregnancy-associated cardiovascular dysfunction and preeclampsia, reinforcing the need for pregnancy-specific approaches in drug development.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.