ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Association between genetic risk and adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet for developing venous thromboembolism.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between diet and venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear, and the joint effects of diet patterns and genetic susceptibility on VTE risk are unknown. Objectives: Investigate the independent and joint effects of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet adherence and polygenic risk scores (PRS) on VTE risk. Methods: A total of 411,539 UK Biobank participants were included. DASH scores were calculated using Food Frequency Questionnaires, and PRS quantified genetic risk. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for VTE, assessing interactions between the DASH diet and genetic susceptibility. Results: During a median follow-up of 13.4 years, 10,543 participants were diagnosed with VTE. Higher DASH scores were associated with a lower VTE risk (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92). A low-adherent DASH diet combined with high-genetic risk had the highest VTE risk (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.47-3.14). High DASH scores reduced VTE risk in high-genetic-risk individuals (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92). Sex-specific associations were detected in the joint effect and interaction of DASH scores and PRS. Notably, high DASH scores can offset moderate genetic risk among men (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94). There were additive interactions between DASH scores and high genetic risk in total subjects and men, while not observed in women. Conclusion: The DASH diet is associated with reduced VTE risk and can partially offset genetic predisposition. Low adherence to the DASH diet increases VTE risk, particularly in high-genetic-risk individuals. The protective effect of high DASH scores against genetic risks for VTE is more pronounced in males. Precision medicine should consider both diet and genetics for VTE prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.