Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237762›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

MINE: a new way to design genetics experiments for discovery.

Isaac Torres, Shufan Zhang, Amanda Bouffier, Michael Skaro, Yue Wu, Lauren Stupp, Jonathan Arnold, Y Anny Chung, H-Bernd Schuttler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Origin of the clock inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac TorresInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Shufan ZhangInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Amanda BouffierInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Michael SkaroInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Yue WuDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309  USA.
Lauren StuppGenetics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Jonathan ArnoldInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
Y Anny ChungPlant Biology and Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.
H-Bernd SchuttlerPhysics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602  USA.

Funding

DOE DE-SC0021386NSF MCB-2041546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Maximally Informative Next Experiment or MINE is a new experimental design approach for experiments, such as those in omics, in which the number of effects or parameters p greatly exceeds the number of samples n (p > n). Classical experimental design presumes n > p for inference about parameters and its application to p > n can lead to over-fitting. To overcome p > n, MINE is an ensemble method, which makes predictions about future experiments from an existing ensemble of models consistent with available data in order to select the most informative next experiment. Its advantages are in exploration of the data for new relationships with n < p and being able to integrate smaller and more tractable experiments to replace adaptively one large classic experiment as discoveries are made. Thus, using MINE is model-guided and adaptive over time in a large omics study. Here, MINE is illustrated in two distinct multiyear experiments, one involving genetic networks in Neurospora crassa and a second one involving a genome-wide association study in Sorghum bicolor as a comparison to classic experimental design in an agricultural setting.

Indexed as

Research DesignComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyNeurospora crassaSorghumensemble methodsgenetic networksGWASMINEmixed linear models

Identifiers

PMID40237762
PMCPMC12001805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.