Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40237877›Full record

ReviewFamilial cancer2025

A review of APC somatic mosaicism and specific APC variants - I1307K and promotor variants.

Shira Shur, Anna K Sommer, Andrew Latchford, Isabel Spier, Lior H Katz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-Related Syndromes.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shira ShurThe Gonczarowski Family Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
Anna K SommerInstitute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andrew Latchford *Polyposis Registry, Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Isabel Spier *Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lior H Katz *Department of Gastroenterology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hadassah Ein-kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. liorkatz5346@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the majority of patients with a classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) a pathogenic APC germline variant is identified; usually these are truncating variants in the coding region of APC. However, there are some special circumstances in which FAP is not the result of a pathogenic heterozygous germline variant in APC (mosaicism) and tspecific APC variants which do not cause FAP (I1307K and promotor variants). This paper will discuss these three conditions. APC somatic (postzygotic) mosaicism can be identified in up to 50% of unexplained adenomatous polyposis cases. The ability to identify APC postzygotic mosaicism depends on the the detection method (today usually next-generation sequencing) and also the tissue being analysed (investigation of multiple colorectal adenomas is more sensitive than leukocyte DNA). Identifying mosaicism has important implications in terms of an individual's management and managing risk in family members. The I1307K variant in APC is prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) but can also be found in Sephardi Jews and individuals of non-Jewish descent. While this variant does not cause polyposis, it increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by 1.68-fold in AJ individuals. However, the link between the I1307K variant and CRC risk in non-AJ populations, is less well-established. Furthermore, its potential impact on other types of cancer remains unclear. Consequently, the classification of this variant, along with appropriate screening and surveillance recommendations, remains a subject of ongoing debate among leading medical and genetic organizations. Variants in the APC promotor 1B region cause the relatively newly described condition of gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). It is said to have an isolated gastric phenotype, with neither duodenal, large bowel nor extra-intestinal manifestations. There are many uncertainties regarding this condition, it's penetrance and management. Lack of clinical data and poor understanding of the natural history of the condition remain significant barriers to developing guidelines to manage this condition.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAdenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinGenes, APCMosaicismColorectal NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansAdenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinAPC protein, humanAPCColorectal cancer riskFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS)I1307KMosaicism

Identifiers

PMID40237877
PMCPMC12003607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.