ReviewFamilial cancer2025
A review of APC somatic mosaicism and specific APC variants - I1307K and promotor variants.
Review in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-Related Syndromes.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Genome Sequencing of Undiagnosed European Patients Suspected of Hereditary Cancer: Diagnostic Yield and Identification of Candidate Causative Variants.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the majority of patients with a classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) a pathogenic APC germline variant is identified; usually these are truncating variants in the coding region of APC. However, there are some special circumstances in which FAP is not the result of a pathogenic heterozygous germline variant in APC (mosaicism) and tspecific APC variants which do not cause FAP (I1307K and promotor variants). This paper will discuss these three conditions. APC somatic (postzygotic) mosaicism can be identified in up to 50% of unexplained adenomatous polyposis cases. The ability to identify APC postzygotic mosaicism depends on the the detection method (today usually next-generation sequencing) and also the tissue being analysed (investigation of multiple colorectal adenomas is more sensitive than leukocyte DNA). Identifying mosaicism has important implications in terms of an individual's management and managing risk in family members. The I1307K variant in APC is prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) but can also be found in Sephardi Jews and individuals of non-Jewish descent. While this variant does not cause polyposis, it increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by 1.68-fold in AJ individuals. However, the link between the I1307K variant and CRC risk in non-AJ populations, is less well-established. Furthermore, its potential impact on other types of cancer remains unclear. Consequently, the classification of this variant, along with appropriate screening and surveillance recommendations, remains a subject of ongoing debate among leading medical and genetic organizations. Variants in the APC promotor 1B region cause the relatively newly described condition of gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). It is said to have an isolated gastric phenotype, with neither duodenal, large bowel nor extra-intestinal manifestations. There are many uncertainties regarding this condition, it's penetrance and management. Lack of clinical data and poor understanding of the natural history of the condition remain significant barriers to developing guidelines to manage this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.