Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Comparative efficacy of preloading plant-based versus animal-based proteins in evoking insulin and incretin responses to attenuate postprandial glucose.
Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have reported that the type of protein consumed as preloads significantly affects postprandial glucose and insulin excursions in healthy and type 2 diabetes. But little is known how protein synergistic preloading affects human health.
objectiveUsing two typical Asian protein type (soya tofu and chicken) with carbohydrate (white rice), the aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different protein types presented synergistically as preloads on postprandial glycemia, insulinemia and incretin secretions in healthy adults.
designSixteen healthy Chinese male adults participated in a randomized, controlled, crossover meal trial. Subjects consumed, in random order, 4 experimental meals that differed in protein type and proportion. Glucose, insulin, incretins and triglyceride concentrations were measured over 3 h.
resultsThere were significant protein type preload treatment x time interaction effects on plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and triglycerides concentrations (P < 0.001). In comparison with rice alone treatment, preloading with Soya, Chicken and Soya/Chicken (50% soya tofu combined with 50% chicken breast) prior to rice consumption all significantly attenuated postprandial glucose response. Soya + Rice treatment induced a significantly lower incremental peak and incremental area under curve (iAUC) (0-60 min) glucose level compared with Chicken + Rice. The postprandial insulin response (incremental peak, iAUC 0-180 min) was significantly lower after Soya + Rice than Chicken + Rice group. Soya/Chicken + Rice treatment did not induce any significant difference in glucose and insulin levels between Soya + Rice or Chicken + Rice group. Notably, Soya/Chicken + Rice as well as Soya + Rice induced a significantly higher GLP1 and GIP responses compared with Rice or Chicken + Rice groups. Soya + Rice and Soya/Chicken + Rice groups stimulated higher triglyceride concentration than the other two groups.
conclusionsDifferent protein preload with rice can considerably influence its glycemic, insulinemic and incretin responses. Soya or Soya/Chicken protein synergistic preloading induced higher incretins responses to modulate glycemic response in healthy adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40237897What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.