Evidence mapPaperPMID 40238039Full record

SynthesisCurrent obesity reports2025

When Weight Matters: How Obesity Impacts Reproductive Health and Pregnancy-A Systematic Review.

Konstantina Barbouni, Vaidas Jotautis, Dimitra Metallinou, Athina Diamanti, Eirini Orovou, Alina Liepinaitienė, Petros Nikolaidis, Grigorios Karampas, Antigoni Sarantaki

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current obesity reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konstantina BarbouniMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece.
Vaidas JotautisFaculty of Medicine, Kauno Kolegija Higher Education Institution, Pramonės Av. 20, 50468, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dimitra MetallinouMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece.
Athina DiamantiMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece.
Eirini OrovouMidwifery Department, University of Western Macedonia, 50200, Ptolemaida, Greece.
Alina LiepinaitienėFaculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Petros NikolaidisEmbryoiatriki-Genetiki Ltd, 49 Kifisias Ave, Athens, Greece.
Grigorios Karampas2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Antigoni SarantakiMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece. esarantaki@uniwa.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis systematic review evaluates the impact of obesity on both male and female reproductive health, assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, and pregnancy-related complications, providing a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence. RECENT

findingsObesity is a critical factor adversely affecting reproductive health, ART success rates, and pregnancy outcomes. Recent studies indicate hormonal disruptions, metabolic syndrome, and epigenetic modifications as central mechanisms linking obesity to infertility and adverse pregnancy results. A systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines included 35 studies, focusing on obesity-related reproductive outcomes. The review highlights that obesity disrupts hormonal balance, including reductions in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone levels, alongside increased insulin resistance and chronic inflammation. These mechanisms impair ovarian function, endometrial receptivity, and sperm quality, resulting in prolonged time-to-pregnancy (TTP), reduced ART success rates, and increased miscarriage risk. During pregnancy, maternal obesity elevates risks of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery while contributing to neonatal complications, such as macrosomia and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. The findings emphasize the dual impact of maternal and paternal obesity on offspring health, particularly through epigenetic modifications leading to intergenerational metabolic dysfunction. This review underscores the necessity of preconception weight management, individualized ART protocols, and tailored antenatal care to mitigate obesity's adverse effects on reproductive outcomes. Future research should focus on understanding male infertility mechanisms, optimizing ART interventions for individuals with obesity, and conducting longitudinal studies on the intergenerational impacts of obesity on reproductive health. This synthesis provides actionable insights to guide clinical practices and future investigations.

Indexed as

ObesityPregnancy ComplicationsReproductive HealthFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedAssisted Reproductive TechnologyEpigeneticsObesityPregnancy ComplicationsProlonged Time-to-PregnancyReproductive HealthSperm

Identifiers

PMID40238039
PMCPMC12003489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.