ReviewDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2025
Narrative Review: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Older Adults with Diabetes.
Review in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reports Inform Clinical Decision-Making for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Mapping Clinical Workflow to Situation Awareness.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Article
- Management strategies in older adults with diabetes mellitus and polypharmacy; a narrative review.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Feasibility of continuous glucose monitoring in an acute geriatric unit - the GLYCOGER study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- The Expanding Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Hypoglycaemia in Older Adults with Diabetes: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Personalized Care in an Aging Population.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring systems on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Metabolism open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has revolutionised diabetes care, with proven effect on glycaemic control, adverse diabetic events (such as hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis) and hospitalisations in the general population. However, the evidence for CGM in older people is less robust.
methodWe conducted a narrative review of trials reporting data comparing standard blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) and CGM in adults over 65 with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were treated with insulin published between 1999 and 2024.
resultsSeventeen studies were identified, including eight retrospective cohort studies and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Sixteen of the 17 papers were based in Europe or North America. The studies were highly heterogeneous; however, they provided clear evidence supporting the use of CGM in reducing hypoglycemia in older adults, with potential benefits for overall wellbeing and quality of life..
conclusionsCurrent approaches to diabetes care in older adults may over-rely on HbA1c (haemoglobin A1c) as a measurement of control given accuracy may be reduced in older adults and propensity for hypoglycaemia. Although goals should be personalised, avoidance of hypoglycaemia is a key goal for many older people with diabetes. There is good evidence that CGM can improve time-in-range and reduce hypoglycaemia and glucose variability in older adults. CGM should be considered for older adults as a means of reducing hypoglycaemia and associated potential harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.