Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40238497›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Urban Greenspace, Climate Adaptation and Health Co-Benefits: Municipal Policy and Practice in London.

Catalina Turcu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Catalina TurcuBartlett School of Planning, University College London, 14 Upper Woburn Place, Central House, London WC1H 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2663-2586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant threat to human health and wellbeing, yet its health impacts can be mitigated through effective local action. Green spaces offer numerous climate benefits to cities, including improving air quality, water management and providing local cooling effects, with subsequent health benefits. Despite such benefits, the current municipal policy and practice faces challenges in aligning climate, health and greenspace interventions on the ground. This paper looks at the municipal evidence base in London. Employing a policy-engaged approach, it draws on semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with London boroughs to unpack what greenspace indicators are measured and why; what feeds into municipal evaluation frameworks; and how greenspace, climate adaptation and health are integrated across London's municipalities. The findings reveal limited and fragmented approaches to measuring the multiple benefits of greenspace interventions, with weak links to climate and health outcomes, and little policy alignment at the municipal level. This has broader implications for data-driven governance models pursued by cities worldwide and for integrating greenspace-climate-health policy and practice within the spatial and political context of cities. The paper concludes by summarising research findings, presenting policy recommendations and highlighting areas of future research.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHealth PolicyCitiesHumansLondonclimate adaptationhealth co-benefitslocal governmentLondonpolicy integrationurban greenspace

Identifiers

PMID40238497
PMCPMC11941841

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.