SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
Unveiling the Potential of Large Language Models in Transforming Chronic Disease Management: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of Large Language Models in Chronic Disease Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of multitype prompt engineering for large language models in hypertension treatment decisions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A multi-layer retrieval-augmented large language model framework for enhancing hypertension education.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Codesigning a Nurse-Led, Large Language Model-Empowered Agent to Increase Hepatitis B Screening and Vaccination for Inclusion Health Populations: A Research Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Quality of AI Responses to Patient Concerns About Axial Spondyloarthritis: Delphi-Based Evaluation.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Performance comparison of large language models for medication counseling in people living with HIV.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Large Language Models and Primary Care: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-5.4 in health education: inter-generation stability and persistent readability challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Deficiencies in clinical reasoning of LLMs in low back pain management and remediation via prompt engineering: from performance evaluation to error diagnosis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- RAG-Enhanced Open SLMs for Hypertension Management Chatbots.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- ChatGPT Performance Deteriorated in Patients with Comorbidities When Providing Cardiological Therapeutic Consultations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research trends in the application of artificial intelligence in nursing of chronic disease: a bibliometric and network visualization study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases are a major global health burden, accounting for nearly three-quarters of the deaths worldwide. Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence systems with transformative potential to optimize chronic disease management; however, robust evidence is lacking.
objectiveThis review aims to synthesize evidence on the feasibility, opportunities, and challenges of LLMs across the disease management spectrum, from prevention to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term care.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, 11 databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore, MEDLINE via Ovid, ProQuest Health & Medicine Collection, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, China National Knowledge Internet, and SinoMed) were searched on April 17, 2024. Intervention and simulation studies that examined LLMs in the management of chronic diseases were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using a rating rubric designed for simulation-based research and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool for quasi-experimental studies. Narrative analysis with descriptive figures was used to synthesize the study findings. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess the pooled effect estimates of the feasibility of LLMs in chronic disease management.
resultsA total of 20 studies examined general-purpose (n=17) and retrieval-augmented generation-enhanced LLMs (n=3) for the management of chronic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders. LLMs demonstrated feasibility across the chronic disease management spectrum by generating relevant, comprehensible, and accurate health recommendations (pooled accurate rate 71%, 95% CI 0.59-0.83; I
conclusionsLLMs have demonstrated the potential to transform chronic disease management at the individual, social, and health care levels; however, their direct application in clinical settings is still in its infancy. A multifaceted approach that incorporates robust data security, domain-specific model fine-tuning, multimodal data integration, and wearables is crucial for the evolution of LLMs into invaluable adjuncts for health care professionals to transform chronic disease management.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024545412; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024545412.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.