ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Systematic genetic perturbation reveals principles underpinning robustness of the epigenetic regulatory network.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Inhibition of SIRT7 Overcomes Radioresistance in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Reactivating MEN1 Expression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular control of epigenetic information relies on hundreds of proteins of diverse function, which cooperate in defining chromatin structure and DNA methylation landscapes. While many individual pathways have been characterized, how different classes of epigenetic regulators interact to build a resilient epigenetic regulatory network (ERN) remains poorly understood. Here, we show that most individual regulators are dispensable for somatic cell fitness, and that robustness emerges from multiple layers of functional cooperation and degeneracy among network components. By disrupting 200 epigenetic regulator genes, individually or in combination, we generated network-wide maps of functional interactions for representative regulators. We found that paralogues represent only a first layer of functional compensation within the ERN, with intra- or inter-class interactions buffering the effects of perturbation in a gene-specific manner: while CREBBP cooperates with multiple acetyltransferases to form a subnetwork that ensures robust chromatin acetylation, ARID1A interacts with regulators from across all functional classes. When combined with oncogene activation, the accumulated epigenetic disorder exposes a synthetic fragility and broadly sensitizes ARID1A-deficient cells to further perturbation. Our findings reveal homeostatic mechanisms through which the ERN sustains somatic cell fitness and uncover how the network remodels as the epigenome is progressively deregulated in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.