ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack in healthy individuals and those with dysmetabolism: a machine learning approach combined with routine blood tests.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of stroke blood biomarker data highlights need for more translational research methods.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning in the diagnosis and prognosis of transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic cerebral infarction is the most prevalent type of stroke, causing significant disability and death worldwide. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a strong predictor of subsequent stroke. Individuals with dysmetabolism, such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes, are at increased risk for cerebral infarction (CI) and TIA. In resource-limited settings, diagnosing CI and TIA can be particularly difficult due to a lack of advanced imaging and specialized expertise. Therefore, we aim to develop a simple, convenient, blood-based approach that could assist clinicians in diagnosing CI and TIA, especially in regions where advanced imaging or stroke-specific expertise is limited. All study subjects were patients admitted to the First Hospital of Xiamen University and healthy check-up populations between January 2018 and September 2023. This study employed five machine learning methods alongside 21 blood routine indicators, 30 blood biochemical indicators, age, and gender to construct predictive models for CI and TIA in both healthy individuals and those with dysmetabolism. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) served as the metric to assess the comprehensive predictive capability of the models. Subsequently, the SHAP package was employed for model interpretation. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) outperforms other models in all predictive models. In the models predicting CI and TIA among healthy, the AUC is 0.9958 (0.9947-0.9969) and 0.9928 (0.9899-0.9951), respectively. Among the nine shared key features of the two models are indicators of glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and liver metabolism. In the models for predicting CI and TIA among patients with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and those with all three metabolic disorders combined, the AUCs ranged from 0.6990 to 0.8591. We found that the indicators K significantly contributed to predict CI and TIA from those with dysmetabolism. Additionally, metabolic-related indicators, such as glucose (GLU) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), are ranked highly among the top ten contributing features. XGBoost performed the best in all models. It can effectively differentiate CI and TIA from healthy and dysmetabolic patients by combining blood routine and blood biochemical indicators. Moreover, it can also differentiate CI from TIA. Although any suspicious findings from this model would still require confirmatory imaging, the simplicity and low cost of blood-based testing may offer a practical adjunct for clinicians-particularly in areas lacking advanced imaging or extensive stroke expertise-and could facilitate earlier diagnostic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.