ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Chronic Wounds and Employment: Assessing Occupation-Related Burden of Patients With Chronic Wounds-Results of a Pilot Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining Wound Care Learning Objectives for Medical Students: A Multidisciplinary Comparison of Expert and Practitioner Perspectives.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic wounds can impact the quality of life of working-age individuals. However, the specific challenges and burdens these patients face in the workplace remain understudied. This study aimed to 1) investigate how chronic wounds affect work life and 2) develop a screening tool for identifying highly affected patients. In total, 51 patients with chronic wounds answered a questionnaire on demographics, employment status, wound-related limitations, workplace conditions, social welfare use and subjective burden of disease. To assess the subjective burden, we developed a specific research tool on employment and chronic wounds (REACH Score) to measure and quantify the impact of the chronic wound on working patients. The patients, who answered the questionnaire, were employed (78%), on sick leave (18%) or retired (4%). They spent an average of 5.3 h per week on wound-related activities. Regarding workplace stressors, we found that taking breaks when needed was correlated with less time off sick and better work-related quality of life. Patients reported career concerns and reduced productivity. The REACH score was significantly correlated with sick leave, work difficulties, time consumed by the wound and overall quality of life. According to our pilot-study, the impact of chronic wounds on patients of working age is most evident in the form of sick leave and reduced work performance and in a reduced quality of life. It is crucial to identify the key factors contributing to stress in the work environment in a larger sample in order to improve the working conditions of patients and detrimental socioeconomic effects on the workforce. The REACH score is a novel tool to screen employed patients with chronic wounds for reduced work capacity and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.