ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
The uneven triad: a qualitative study of perspectives of relatives, patients, and professionals on (not) involving relatives in mental health.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It has to be part of the clinic's lived culture"- perspectives of next of kin on meaningful participation in psychiatric care: a participatory thematic analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A cross sectional study of perceived couple communication patterns and influencing factors among colorectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Life History, Identity, and Recovery in People with Mental Health Conditions: A Phenomenological Study Using OPHI-II.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The time toxicity experience of primary caregivers of schizophrenia: a descriptive phenomenological study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRecognition of the value of involving relatives in mental health care is growing. This study explores the ambivalence surrounding their role, including formalisation, instrumental use, burden, and potential benefits. Collaboration between relatives, patients, and professionals is essential to recovery-based approaches. Thus, despite challenges, the involvement of relatives remains crucial. This study aims to understand perspectives on involving relatives in mental health care, within the larger context of collaboration across the triad of relatives, patients, and professionals.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with relatives (n = 7), patients (n = 7), and professionals (n = 10) connected to various mental health care organizations. The study took place in The Netherlands. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsFor collaboration in the triad, we found five aspects to be of importance: the significance of involving relatives, changing roles from relative to caregiver, relatives' intermediary role in patient-professional relationship, negative experiences of relatives in the triad, and ambivalence about patient's autonomy. Notably, because collaboration between professionals and relatives is often challenging, it often leads to tensions.
conclusionOur study uncovers varying perspectives both on involving relatives and on collaboration within the triad. Recovery-oriented approaches do not always align with patients' and relatives' intentions and values. Although relatives want to be involved, they often feel unheard and unseen by professionals. Relatives' roles -especially the intermediary role- are surprisingly underrepresented in the recovery-oriented literature. This study reveals several tensions between the three perspectives, culminating in a so-called uneven triad. We conclude that although the concept of involving relatives is highly advocated in recovery-based approaches, actual practice is lagging behind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.