ReviewDegenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease2025
Gene Editing for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From Experimental Models to Emerging Therapies.
Review in Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Prime Editing Driven Functional Genomics: Bridging Genotype to Phenotype in the Post-Genomic Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Neuromuscular Mechanisms and Oxidative Stress in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy: Emerging Stem Cell and Gene-Based Therapeutic Strategies.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical translation of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics in cancer and inherited genetic disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Adenoviral Vectors in Gene Therapy: A Detailed Overview.Iranian biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Beyond the Exome: The Role of Noncoding and Regulatory Variants in Monogenic Diseases.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Integrating Current Clinical Practice with Future Therapeutic and Diagnostic Horizons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Understanding Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated brain pathology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR system has emerged as a ground-breaking gene-editing tool, offering promising therapeutic potential for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a severe genetic disorder affecting approximately 1 in 5000 male births globally. DMD is caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene, which encodes a critical membrane-associated protein essential for maintaining muscle structure, function and repair. Patients with DMD experience progressive muscle degeneration, loss of ambulation, respiratory insufficiency, and cardiac failure, with most succumbing to the disease by their third decade of life. Despite the well-characterized genetic basis of DMD, curative treatments- such as exon skipping therapies, micro-dystrophin, and steroids- remain elusive. Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated the promise of CRISPR-based approaches in restoring dystrophin expression across various models, including human cells, murine systems, and large animal models. These advancements highlight the potential of gene editing to fundamentally alter the trajectory of the disease. However, significant challenges persist, including immunogenicity, off-target effects, and limited editing efficiency, which hinder clinical translation. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the latest developments in CRISPR-based therapeutic strategies for DMD. It emphasizes the need for further innovation in gene-editing technologies, delivery systems, and rigorous safety evaluations to overcome current barriers and harness the full potential of CRISPR/Cas as a durable and effective treatment for DMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.