ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Global Insights and Key Trends in Physical Literacy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review from 2007 to 2024.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global trends and emerging themes in youth physical literacy research: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extensive research has been carried out on physical literacy (PL) over the past decades. Nonetheless, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis of relevant publications has been performed. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric review of studies on PL to track research trends and highlight current research hotspots. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was selected to retrieve publications from inception to 2024 on PL. Articles and reviews written in English with PL as the main topic were included. VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were used to perform analysis and visualization of scientific productivity and emerging trends. Results: A total of 710 publications were retrieved. Canada dominated this field with the most publications (188). The institution and author with the largest number of articles were The Chinese University of Hong Kong (46 publications) and Cairney John (35 publications), respectively. BMC Public Health was the most influential journal with 41 articles and 1214 citations. Publications were primarily distributed across journals in sports science, education, public health, and other allied disciplines. Five topics were identified by reference co-citation analysis and keyword analysis: the definition of PL, PL in education, the association of PL, the intervention of PL, and the measurement and assessment of PL. The measurement, assessment and intervention of PL may become the frontiers. Conclusion: PL research has witnessed growing scholarly interest over the past 18 years. The concept of PL lacks consensus, and the necessity of establishing a unified conceptualization remains contentious. Most existing PL measurement tools lack comprehensiveness in capturing conceptual components, highlighting the need for established instruments aligned with its theoretical foundations. PL interventions vary in design and effectiveness, making it essential to identify effective strategies. Furthermore, multidisciplinary collaboration is imperative. This study could offer strategic guidance for identifying potential collaborators and prioritizing research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.