Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242225›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025

Predicting outcomes using neural networks in the intensive care unit.

Gumpeny R Sridhar, Venkat Yarabati, Lakshmi Gumpeny

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gumpeny R SridharDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Endocrine and Diabetes Centre, Visakhapatnam 530002, India. grsridhar@hotmail.com.
Venkat YarabatiChief Architect, Data and Insights, AGILISYS, London W127RZ, United Kingdom.
Lakshmi GumpenyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Healthcare and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam 530048, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) require rapid critical decision making. Modern ICUs are data rich, where information streams from diverse sources. Machine learning (ML) and neural networks (NN) can leverage the rich data for prognostication and clinical care. They can handle complex nonlinear relationships in medical data and have advantages over traditional predictive methods. A number of models are used: (1) Feedforward networks; and (2) Recurrent NN and convolutional NN to predict key outcomes such as mortality, length of stay in the ICU and the likelihood of complications. Current NN models exist in silos; their integration into clinical workflow requires greater transparency on data that are analyzed. Most models that are accurate enough for use in clinical care operate as 'black-boxes' in which the logic behind their decision making is opaque. Advances have occurred to see through the opacity and peer into the processing of the black-box. In the near future ML is positioned to help in clinical decision making far beyond what is currently possible. Transparency is the first step toward validation which is followed by clinical trust and adoption. In summary, NNs have the transformative ability to enhance predictive accuracy and improve patient management in ICUs. The concept should soon be turning into reality.

Indexed as

Black-boxConvoluted neural networksHallucinationsLarge language modelsSupervised learningUnsupervised learningWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID40242225
PMCPMC11718574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.