Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242310›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Serum FGF21 as a predictor of response to atezolizumab and bevacizumab in HCC.

Risako Kohya, Goki Suda, Masatsugu Ohara, Shunichi Hosoda, Takuya Sho, Makoto Chuma, Atsumasa Komori, Yuki Kugiyama, Yutaka Yasui, Kaoru Tsuchiya and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Risako KohyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Goki SudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masatsugu OharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shunichi HosodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takuya ShoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Makoto ChumaGastroenterology Centre, Yokohama City University Medical Centre, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Atsumasa KomoriHepatology Division, NHO Nagasaki Medical Centre, Ōmura, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuki KugiyamaHepatology Division, NHO Nagasaki Medical Centre, Ōmura, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yutaka YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaoru TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki KurosakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan.
Joji TaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Shun KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mina NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro AsahinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya MaekawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Kofu City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Nobuyuki EnomotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Kofu City, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yoshiya YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masaru BabaCentre for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japan Community Healthcare Organisation Hokkaido Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ren YamadaKushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takashi SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomoka YodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Sonoe YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Qingjie FuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Zijian YangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Osamu MaeharaLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shunsuke OhnishiLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yoshimasa TokuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takashi KitagatayaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Naoki KawagishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masato NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Mitsuteru NatsuizakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Koji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a crucial regulator of cell metabolism. Tumour-secreted FGF21 has shown immune-checkpoint factor functions, and high FGF21 levels are associated with a poor prognosis for patients. However, its prognostic value and impact on treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear. Thus, this study investigated the potential of high FGF21 levels as a prognostic marker and whether traditional ICI-based therapy can improve the prognosis of patients with high FGF21 levels. Methods: In this retrospective multicentre study, patients with unresectable HCC who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab in the NORTE study group (n = 117) were classified into high (≥915 pg/ml; n = 29) and non-high (n = 88) FGF21 groups. For validation, we investigated patients treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab in an independent cohort (n = 285). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response were compared between patients with and without high baseline FGF21 levels. Results: The median overall survival ( Conclusions: Serum FGF21 may be a robust, non-invasive prognostic and treatment response marker for unresectable HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Impact and implications: FGF21 has been reported to act as a secreted immune-checkpoint factor, and elevated levels of FGF21 are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with HCC. It is not fully understood whether ICIs can overcome the impact of high FGF21 levels on the shortened prognosis of patients with HCC. In this multicentre retrospective study, patients with HCC and high baseline levels of serum FGF21 who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival and shorter progression-free survival. These findings suggest serum FGF21 as a robust prognostic marker and an indicator of treatment response in unresectable HCC treated with ICI-based therapy. These findings could be crucial for the implementation of personalised treatment strategies for unresectable HCC. However, identifying optimal therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC and high serum FGF21 levels remains an urgent and critical clinical issue.

Indexed as

AtezolizumabBevacizumabFGF21Hepatocellular CarcinomaImmune-checkpoint inhibitorPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40242310
PMCPMC11999275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.