ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2025
Clinical and experimental treatment of residual immune activation in people living with HIV.
Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Durability and effectiveness of dual vs. triple therapy and tablet simplification in ART: findings from the Italian MOSAICO study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potent inflammatory responses stemming from innate and T cell activation are initiated during acute human immunodeficiency virus infection. Suppression of the virus replication by antiretroviral therapy reduces but does not normalize immune activation. By now, it is clear that residual immune activation can persist even after years of antiretroviral therapy and associates with increased risks for co-morbidities, thereby raising interest for strategies that can resolve the residual immune activation in people with human immunodeficiency virus on antiretrovirals. This brief review reports the human studies with various drugs with anti-inflammatory properties and their effects on measures of systemic immune activation on people with human immunodeficiency virus. Along with the possible reasons for conflicting outcomes, considerations for ongoing and future approaches are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.