Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243833›Full record

ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025

Disparity in meat consumption: An obstacle to achieving the golden rule of the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines?

Mariana Souza Lopes, Paulo Gustavo Costa E Silva Cruz, Joerika Batista Ciqueira, Cecília Furtado Craveiro, Izabele da Silva Rocha, Savio Marcelino Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariana Souza LopesUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3964-910X
Paulo Gustavo Costa E Silva CruzUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-7845
Joerika Batista CiqueiraUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-4251
Cecília Furtado CraveiroUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4586-194X
Izabele da Silva RochaUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4537-1962
Savio Marcelino GomesUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate disparities in meat consumption in Brazil and analyze its relationship with the intake of fresh fruits and vegetables.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study using secondary data from the 2019 National Health Survey. Red meat consumption (in days) was estimated according to socioeconomic and demographic data. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, and the association between meat consumption and fruit and vegetable intake was assessed by means of Poisson regression.

resultsOf a total of 83,085 Brazilians participating in the study, 29.2% reported consuming meat 5-7 times per week. Sociodemographic and economic factors revealed a lower likelihood of consuming meat 5-7 days/week among women [OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.46; 0.53), older adults (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.37; 0.63) and residents of the Northeast region of the country (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.66; 0.79). After adjustments, red meat consumption was directly associated (p-value<0.001) with vegetable intake (0.04) and inversely associated with fruit intake (-0.04).

conclusionMeat consumption is unequal among Brazilians and may have an impact on the consumption of fresh foods, such as fruits.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorMeatNutrition PolicyAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFruitHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID40243833
PMCPMC11998654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.