Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244251›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Extracellular Vesicles from Different Mesenchymal Stem Cell Types Exhibit Distinctive Surface Protein Profiling and Molecular Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis.

Atziri G Fernández-Pérez, Azucena Herrera-González, Edgar J López-Naranjo, Iliany Annel Martínez-Álvarez, David Uribe-Rodríguez, Daniel E Ramírez-Arreola, María Judith Sánchez-Peña, Jose Navarro-Partida

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Atziri G Fernández-PérezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico.
Azucena Herrera-GonzálezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-5393
Edgar J López-NaranjoCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico.
Iliany Annel Martínez-ÁlvarezCentro de Biotecnología Santer S.C., Guadalajara 45040, Jalisco, Mexico.
David Uribe-RodríguezCentro de Biotecnología Santer S.C., Guadalajara 45040, Jalisco, Mexico.
Daniel E Ramírez-ArreolaCentro Universitario de la Costa Sur (CUCSUR), University of Guadalajara, Autlan 48900, Jalisco, Mexico.
María Judith Sánchez-PeñaCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1882-8725
Jose Navarro-PartidaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology, Zapopan 45201, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-821X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current medical need to respond to different diseases has sparked great interest in extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) due to their great regenerative potential and as drug carriers by playing a critical role in cell-cell communication. However, due to their heterogeneity, there is no standardized universal method for their identification and characterization, which limits their clinical application. This study, following the recommendations and methodologies proposed by MISEV2023 for the characterization of EVs, shows for the first time a detailed morphological, protein, and biochemical comparison between EVs derived from three different MSCs sources (placenta, endometrium, and dental pulp). The information obtained from the different applied assays suggests that there are substantial differences between one EVs source and another. It also offers valuable insights that provide the guidelines to ease their profiling and therefore improve their selection, in order to speed up their use and clinical application; additionally, the knowledge obtained from each characterization test could facilitate new researchers in the field to choose a specific cell source to obtain EVs and select the appropriate methods that provide the necessary information according to their requirements.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMembrane ProteinsMesenchymal Stem CellsDental PulpEndometriumFemaleHumansMembrane ProteinsEVs of human dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hDP-MSC-EVs)EVs of human endometrium-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hE-MSC-EVs)EVs of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hP-MSC-EVs)extracellular vesicles (EVs)

Identifiers

PMID40244251
PMCPMC11989379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.