ReviewCognitive research: principles and implications2025
Can humanoid robots be used as a cognitive offloading tool?
Review in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Class AI Use and Attitudes Among University Students: The Different Mediating Roles of Cognitive Relief and Cognitive Offloading.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cognitive Load in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis (2021-2025).Annals of neurosciences · 2026Review
- When robots reshape teams: neurodynamic insights into taskwork and teamwork in search and rescue.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive load occurs when the demands of a task surpass the available processing capacity, straining mental resources and potentially impairing performance efficiency, such as increasing the number of errors in a task. Owing to its ubiquity in real-world scenarios, the existence of offloading strategies to reduce cognitive load is not new to experts and nonexperts, and many of these strategies involve technology (e.g., using Calendar Apps to remember scheduled events). Surprisingly, little is known about the potential use of humanoid robots for cognitive offloading. We will examine studies assessing the influence of humanoid robots on cognitive tasks requiring the resolution of cognitive conflict to determine whether their presence facilitates or hinders cognitive performance. Our analysis focuses on standardized cognitive conflict paradigms, as these effectively simulate real-life conflict scenarios (i.e., everyday challenges in focusing on the task and ignoring distractions). In these studies, robots were involved by either participating in the tasks, providing social cues, or observing human performance. By identifying contexts where humanoid robots support cognitive offloading and where they may undermine it, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of cognitive processes in human-robot interaction (HRI) and informs the design of interventions aimed at improving task performance and well-being in professional HRI settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.