ArticlePLoS medicine2025
Reduced insulin use and diabetes complications upon introduction of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP1-receptor agonists in low- and middle-income countries: A microsimulation.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Evidence of the Effectiveness and Safety of Biosynthetic Semaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicentre Study From Pakistan.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus, particularly type 2 diabetes, is a growing health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The potential impact of newer diabetes medications, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, on insulin dosage and health outcomes in these settings is not well understood. METHODS AND
findingsWe developed a microsimulation model to estimate the impact of treating patients with type 2 diabetes who use insulin with GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors in LMICs. The model utilized data from the Global Health and Population Project on Access to Care for Cardiometabolic Diseases (HPACC) dataset, encompassing surveys from 79 countries and clinical trial data to estimate insulin dose reduction. We incorporated weight-based insulin dosing formulas and hazard ratios for severe hypoglycemia, cardiovascular and renal outcomes, side effects of new therapies, and mortality. The primary outcome was the change in insulin dosage, and secondary outcomes were disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost per 1,000 person-years by diabetes complication (micro- and macro-vascular). Our results indicate that the addition of GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors could reduce insulin dosage by 8.2 IU/day (IQR: 6.9, 9.5) and 5.3 IU/day (IQR: 4.5, 6.2), respectively. The median DALYs lost per 1,000 person-years decreased from 2.20 (IQR: 1.49, 4.02) to 1.01 (IQR: 0.61, 1.86) with GLP-1 receptor agonists and 1.25 (IQR: 0.81, 2.29) with SGLT-2 inhibitors. Primary benefits arose from weight loss, decreased cardiorenal disease, and decreased mortality, with smaller DALY benefits from the prevention of severe hypoglycemia. Key limitations include the inability to differentiate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes in some datasets and reliance on assumptions from clinical trials conducted primarily in high-income countries.
conclusionsThe introduction of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors for managing type 2 diabetes in LMICs could significantly reduce insulin dosage and associated health risks, leading to improved outcomes and reduced disability. These findings suggest that expanding access to these newer diabetes medications in LMICs could have substantial public health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.