ArticlePloS one2025
TriLex: A fusion approach for unsupervised sentiment analysis of short texts.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, online customer reviews and social media platforms have significantly impacted individuals' daily lives. Despite the generally short nature of textual content on these platforms, they convey a wide range of user sentiments. However, sentiment analysis of short texts poses a challenge due to their context limitations. In addition, traditional supervised machine learning methods often struggle with the dynamic nature of sentiment expression and the scarcity of labeled data, which is a cost-efficiency issue. To address these challenges, this paper proposes TriLex, a novel unsupervised approach that leverages the majority votes of multiple lexicon-based sentiment analysis tools. TriLex categorizes agreement among TextBlob, VADER, and AFINN as strong labels and disagreement as weak labels. To improve sentiment labeling, we normalize sentiment scores across all lexicons and apply weighted averaging to compute a majority vote sentiment score. It then generates a new label for the weak label based on a dynamic threshold derived from the majority vote. The effectiveness of TriLex is evaluated on benchmark datasets for the accuracy, F1 score, precision, and recall of Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and LSTM models. The proposed TriLex model improves the accuracy of sentiment prediction by 2%-8%. Overall, our results demonstrate that TriLex outperformed methods relying on individual lexicons and existing fusion-based alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.