Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40245030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

TriLex: A fusion approach for unsupervised sentiment analysis of short texts.

Abdulrahman Alharbi, Rafaa Aljurbua, Shelly Gupta, Zoran Obradovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdulrahman AlharbiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0003-7559-3533
Rafaa AljurbuaDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shelly GuptaDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Zoran ObradovicDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, online customer reviews and social media platforms have significantly impacted individuals' daily lives. Despite the generally short nature of textual content on these platforms, they convey a wide range of user sentiments. However, sentiment analysis of short texts poses a challenge due to their context limitations. In addition, traditional supervised machine learning methods often struggle with the dynamic nature of sentiment expression and the scarcity of labeled data, which is a cost-efficiency issue. To address these challenges, this paper proposes TriLex, a novel unsupervised approach that leverages the majority votes of multiple lexicon-based sentiment analysis tools. TriLex categorizes agreement among TextBlob, VADER, and AFINN as strong labels and disagreement as weak labels. To improve sentiment labeling, we normalize sentiment scores across all lexicons and apply weighted averaging to compute a majority vote sentiment score. It then generates a new label for the weak label based on a dynamic threshold derived from the majority vote. The effectiveness of TriLex is evaluated on benchmark datasets for the accuracy, F1 score, precision, and recall of Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and LSTM models. The proposed TriLex model improves the accuracy of sentiment prediction by 2%-8%. Overall, our results demonstrate that TriLex outperformed methods relying on individual lexicons and existing fusion-based alternatives.

Indexed as

Social MediaUnsupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40245030
PMCPMC12005507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.