Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40245241›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate Associated With Risk of Frailty and Likelihood of Reversion.

Dingchun Hou, Shangjun Liu, Yumei Sun, Chang Liu, Xue Shang, Lijun Pei, Gong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dingchun HouInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shangjun LiuInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yumei SunSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chang LiuSchool of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Xue ShangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lijun PeiInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Gong ChenInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China 23ZDA101Strategic Research and Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering 2022-XBZD-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a simple and effective measure for insulin resistance, which is associated with higher risk of frailty. We aim to analyse the associations of eGDR with frailty risk and its reversibility.

methodsA population-based longitudinal study was conducted of 11 670 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study and 19 355 participants from the Health and Retirement Study. Frailty was assessed by the frailty index and reversibility was measured by transitions from frailty at baseline to non-frailty during follow-up. The eGDR was divided into Q

resultsIn Chinese population characterized by a median age of 60 years (IQR: 54-66) with 6119 women (52.43%), compared with the Q

conclusionsHigher levels of eGDR were associated with a reduced risk of frailty, delayed transition from non-frailty to frailty and an increased likelihood of reversion. eGDR emerges as a promising predictor for early frailty detection, prognosis assessment and a potential therapeutic target for intervention strategies.

Indexed as

FrailtyGlucoseAgedChinaFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsGlucoseestimated glucose disposal ratefrailtyinsulin resistancereversibility

Identifiers

PMID40245241
PMCPMC12005398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.