Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of combined high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training alone in male adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Combined effects of sodium alginate supplementation with HIIT and MICT on CCK and PYY levels in men with metabolic syndrome.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to investigate the combining effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) compared to MICT alone on physical fitness, academic performance, and anxiety levels among adolescents in a school setting.
methodsSixty male adolescents were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (HIIT + MICT) or a control group (MICT only) for 12 weeks. Physical fitness was assessed using lung capacity, a 50-meter sprint, a standing long jump, and a 1000-meter run. Anxiety levels were measured using the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, and cognitive performance through academic evaluations. Statistical analyses included Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U, unpaired t-tests, chi-square, and McNemar tests.
resultsAfter 12 weeks, the experimental group showed a significant increase in lung capacity (10.30 ml/kg) compared to the control group (3.18 ml/kg, P = 0.03). Sprint and run completion times were also significantly faster in the experimental group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.02), with greater improvements in the long jump (P = 0.01). Academic performance and anxiety levels improved significantly in the experimental group (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01), while the control group exhibited no significant changes.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that combining HIIT with MICT results in greater improvements in adolescent cardiorespiratory fitness, anaerobic performance, academic outcomes, and anxiety levels compared to MICT alone. These findings support the incorporation of HIIT alongside traditional MICT in adolescents.
trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in the clinical trials registry on 26/04/2023 (ChiCTR2300070895).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.