ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Prevalence and determinants of mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact: an assessment from the 2017-18 BDHS data.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and community-level determinants of skin-to-skin contact in Somaliland: a multilevel analysis of the 2020 demographic and health survey data.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Multilevel Determinants of Mother-Infant Skin-to-Skin Contact at Birth in Somalia: Findings from Somali Demographic and Health Survey.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence shows that skin-to-skin contact (SSC) enhances children's well-being. More information is needed on the prevalence and determinants of SSC in Bangladesh. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of mothers and their newborns' skin-to-skin contact in Bangladesh.
methodsData extracted from a cross-sectional survey, (Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18), where 5304 (unweighted) women who gave birth in the last 3 years preceding the survey were included in the final analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the determinants of SSC practice. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.
resultsThe prevalence of SSC practice in Bangladesh was 15.6% (95% CI [14.3, 17.0]). The adjusted regression model showed that the SSC practice was significantly associated with the geographic region, place of delivery, mode of delivery, and number of antenatal care visits. The SSC practice was 50% lower (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.3, 0.8]) in the Rajshahi Division compared to the Dhaka Division. Women who had an institutional delivery had 2 times higher odds (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI [1.6, 2.5]) of SSC practice than women who had experienced a non-institutional delivery. Compared to women who delivered by cesarean section, the odds of SSC practice were 2.1 times higher (aOR = 2.1, 95% CI [1.6, 2.6]) for women who had a normal delivery. Women who completed at least four antenatal visits had 20% higher odds (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI [1.0, 1.4]) of SSC practice than women who completed fewer than four antenatal visits.
conclusionGiven that only approximately one-sixth of the surveyed women are engaged in SSC practice, informal instructional and awareness programs are necessary in Bangladesh to promote the importance and extent of SSC practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.