Evidence mapPaperPMID 40247268Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.

Jennifer Kendziorra, Kirsten H Seerig, Till J Winkler, Heiko Gewald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer KendziorraChair of Information Management, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany. jennifer.kendziorra@fernuni-hagen.de.
Kirsten H SeerigInstitute for Digital Innovation (IDI), Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Till J WinklerChair of Information Management, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Heiko GewaldInstitute for Digital Innovation (IDI), Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of digital therapeutics (DTx) into the German statutory healthcare system marks a significant shift in medical practice through the introduction of innovative, reimbursable digital interventions for patient care. While DTx can bridge therapy gaps and enhance patient care, the number of prescriptions is increasing slowly. This study aims to explore the challenges physicians face when integrating DTx into their treatment options and the changes this integration entails for their medical workflows.

methodsA qualitative approach was adopted, gathering data from semi-structured interviews with 46 physicians across Germany. Participants, sampled for diversity in specialty, experience, and region, were interviewed between June 2022 and August 2024. The interviews explored physicians' knowledge, experiences, and perspectives on DTx. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, combining deductive and inductive coding.

resultsThe introduction of DTx into physicians' workflows impacts their practice on multiple levels. First, physicians must become aware of the new regulations and therapeutic possibilities, requiring significant information intake and time to feel adequately prepared for prescribing DTx. Second, DTx add complexity to patient assessment, as physicians must evaluate factors such as digital literacy, motivation, and cognitive conditions, necessitating a deeper understanding of their patients. Third, the integration of DTx reshapes the physician‒patient relationship, as it alters interaction dynamics, redistributes responsibilities, and poses new communication challenges. Fourth, DTx expand therapeutic options, particularly by bridging therapy delays and enabling more personalized care. Finally, the integration of DTx has the potential to drive long-term changes in physicians' workflows and mindsets, fostering alignment with multimodal and patient-centered treatment approaches.

conclusionsDTx offer opportunities for patient care but also pose challenges, such as the development of digital skills or familiarization with new regulations, that necessitate adjustments in physicians' workflows. Physicians are generally confronted with an innovation that demands time, reliable information on effectiveness, practical experience, and openness to adopting digital health tools as complementary treatment options. However, the reception and integration of DTx into treatment vary among physicians, reflecting individual preferences and approaches. Further research should explore these diverse adoption strategies and examine the long-term effects of DTx on care delivery and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWorkflowDigital healthDigital therapeuticsGerman healthcare systemMedical practicesPhysician rolesQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40247268
PMCPMC12007376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.