ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Improvements in cancer survival in Hungary: a nationwide epidemiology study between 2011-2019 based on a health insurance fund database.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Scan: Adapting Multimodal Lung Cancer Screening for Central and Eastern Europe-Overcoming Systemic Barriers and Epidemiological Confounders.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Overall Survival of Hungarian Cancer Patients Diagnosed Between 2011 and 2019, Based on the Health Insurance Fund Database.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of cancer survival is crucial for evaluating advancements in cancer management. As part of the nationwide HUN-CANCER EPI study, we examined the net survival of the Hungarian cancer patient population in 2011-2019. Methods: Using extracted data from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database, the HUN-CANCER EPI study aimed to assess net survival probabilities for various cancer types over the past decade by the Pohar Perme Estimator method, providing insights for sex and age-specific differences and enabling comparative analysis with other European countries. Results: Between 2011 and 2019, 526,381 newly diagnosed cancer cases were identified, with colorectal, lung, breast, prostate, and bladder cancers being the most common. Age-standardized 5-year net survival rates showed significant improvements from 2011-12 till 2017-19 periods for colorectal cancer from 55.08% to 59.78% (4.70%), lung cancer from 20.10% to 23.55% (3.45%), liver cancer from 11.21% to 16.97% (5.76%) and melanoma from 90.06% to 93.80% (3.73%), while clinically relevant, but not significant improvements for breast cancer from 85.03% to 86.84% (1.81%), prostate cancer from 88.13% to 89.76% (1.63%) and thyroid cancer from 87.23% to 92.36% (5.12%). Women generally had better survival probabilities, with notable variations across cancer types. We found no significant age-related differences in cancer survival in women, while survival improvements of colorectal cancer were more pronounced in younger cohorts among male patients. International comparisons using different mortality life tables demonstrated favorable breast and prostate cancer survival rates in Hungary compared to other Central Eastern European countries. Conclusion: The HUN-CANCER EPI study revealed positive trends in cancer survival for most cancer types between 2011 and 2019. The study highlights the continued positive trajectory of cancer survival in Hungary like to more developed European countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.