ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Self-care methods use for acne treatment among health science students.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of self-care methods, such as over-the-counter (OTC) products and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), is common along the acne care pathway. This study aimed to explore self-care methods for acne and assess their associations with acne severity. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among university students in health programs. Convenience sampling was used to invite participants to complete a survey containing sociodemographic, clinical, and self-care-related questions. Acne diagnosis and severity were evaluated by a physician via the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). A multivariate regression model was used to analyze the associations between variables. Results: The final sample comprised 190 participants, with 24.2 % males and 70.8 % females. Most participants had mild acne (77.4 %) and reported positive family histories (82.1 %). Approximately one-third used OTC products (31.1 %), and nearly two-thirds used CAM (62.6 %). The most frequently used OTC products were facial cleansers (48.2 %), followed by creams and moisturizers (30.7 %) and cleansing soap (21.1 %). A lack of acne severity was the primary reason for the use of CAM. Social media (46.7 %) and the internet (46.2 %) were the most frequently reported sources of information. Acne severity was associated with OTC product use ( Conclusions: This study identified the most common OTC products and CAM used in acne and demonstrated an association between OTC product use and acne severity. Future studies should explore discussions on self-care methods in clinical consultations and the timing of using these methods throughout the care pathway. Integrating shared decision-making in clinical practice and tailoring educational interventions to patient preferences and communication channels may encourage the safe and effective use of self-care methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.