ArticlemHealth2025
Factors driving the use of mobile health app: insights from a survey.
Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Continuous Nursing Based on IKAP Theory on Periodontal Indicators and Self-Management Ability of Patients With Periodontal Disease.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Design and Usability Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Postoperative Self-Management in Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Increasing Truck Drivers' Compliance, Retention, and Long-Term Engagement with e-Health & Mobile Applications: A PRISMA Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Immersive Tai Chi for Home-Based Exercise in Older Adults: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Perceived usefulness and satisfaction of pregnant women with a WhatsApp-based education intervention aiming to improve access to pregnancy care: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition and Dietetics: A Comprehensive Review of Current Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Trust, perceived accuracy, and continued use of patient-facing symptom monitoring applications: Cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Attitudes towards personalised nutrition recommendations in health apps: Results of a cross-sectional online survey.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile health (mHealth) offers easy accessibility to healthcare information and services, promoting positive behaviour change. However, user engagement to mHealth diminishes over time, resulting in significant dropout rates. This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discontinuation of mHealth use and examine how persuasive elements influence users' intention to continue using mHealth. It also seeks to identify the key motivators and barriers affecting mHealth engagement. Methods: A survey was conducted to assess persuasive elements, motivators, and barriers related to mHealth usage. The survey included measures to evaluate users' perceived persuasiveness of mHealth, the factors influencing their intention to continue using it, and both the motivators and barriers to its sustained use. Results: The analysis revealed that unobtrusiveness had the strongest positive correlation with the intention to continue using mHealth. Additionally, a positive association was found between users' perception of mHealth's persuasiveness and their intention to continue using it. The study also identified key motivators that encourage mHealth adoption and several barriers that hinder long-term engagement. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of developing strategies to enhance the long-term adoption of mHealth solutions and reduce dropout rates. Future research is needed to explore effective interventions for sustaining mHealth usage and addressing the barriers that lead to disengagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.