ArticleStress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress2025
Chronic Stress May Amplify Gender/Sex Differences in Amygdala Reactivity to Ambiguous Emotional Stimuli.
Article in Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heightened reactivity to ambiguous emotional stimuli, such as surprized faces, is a transdiagnostic psychopathology risk factor. Women show elevated amygdala activation to ambiguous emotional stimuli relative to men, which may underlie their significantly higher risk for mood disorders. Moreover, there are sex/gender differences in the effects of stress on both emotion processing and emotion regulation, with greater impact of stress on negative emotionality in females. We predicted that chronic stress would be associated with stronger amygdala activation to surprized faces, and these effects would be amplified in girls/women. We tested the interactions of chronic stress and gender/sex on amygdala activity in a sample of 297 healthy participants (59% girls/women, age range 6-75 years) who provided a saliva sample and who viewed emotional face stimuli while undergoing functional neuroimaging. Saliva samples were assayed for two markers of chronic stress: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) expression and diversity of Lactobacilli species. Among girls/women, higher chronic stress was associated with greater amygdala activation to ambiguous emotional images than lower stress exposure, although this effect was not statistically significant. Counter to predictions, the reverse effect was found among boys/men (i.e., higher stress exposure was associated with lower amygdala activation). Results were similar across left and right amygdalae, and across both stress measures. Although our findings are preliminary and should be replicated, they align with findings on gender differences in valence bias, and broadly support the hypothesis that there are gender/sex differences in the effects of chronic stress on neural reactivity to emotional ambiguity, particularly in areas of the brain sensitive to emotion regulation. Possibly, stress does not universally increase negativity, but instead amplifies default emotional biases-which for boys/men, may result in less amygdala reactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.