SynthesisJournal of forensic sciences2025
Systematic analysis of population studies performed with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit.
Synthesis in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic analysis of population studies performed with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many forensic laboratories have conducted sequence-based population studies to support the integration of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). However, the data remain limited concerning African populations. MPS enhances allelic representation compared to CE methods. It is hypothesized that this increase will be more pronounced for African populations due to their greater genetic diversity. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compile data from population genetic studies using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit, frequently employed in forensic MPS population studies. The aim of the review was to gain insight into global forensic sequence-based population data, focusing on African and underrepresented populations. The search spanned three databases, resulting in 582 records, where 40 articles met inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 20 qualified for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis aimed to quantify the increase in genetic variation in autosomal short tandem repeat (A-STR) markers using allele counts and random match probability (RMP). Most population studies were conducted in high-income countries (65%, 26/40), with none from Africa. Only 14 out of 40 studies included concordance data, with 13 of these reporting rates above 99%. The meta-analysis covered 35 population groups and found that of the 27 A-STR markers evaluated, mean allele counts increased by 53.08% from length-to-sequence-based analyses. African ancestry groups showed the highest increase in allele counts and the biggest reduction in RMP. Despite substantial genetic diversity in African populations, their representation in MPS studies is minimal. Addressing this gap is crucial to justify further research in African countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.