Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249474›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026

Effect of Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Class III Children on Quality of Life, Dentofacial and Upper Airway Characteristics: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Stjepan Spalj, Martina Zigante, Vedrana Tudor, Taner Öztürk, Ahmet Yağcı, Juan Martin Palomo

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Positive Longitudinal Caregiver Behavioral Ratings and Self-Reported Quality of Life in Youth With Cleft Lip and Palate in Treatment for Class III Malocclusion.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stjepan SpaljFaculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-3903
Martina ZiganteFaculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Vedrana TudorFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Universtiy of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Taner ÖztürkFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Ahmet YağcıFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Juan Martin PalomoDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-2595

Funding

Fulbright research scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the relationship between early dentofacial orthopaedic treatment, improvement in the width of oropharynx and nasopharynx, and quality of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-three prepubertal children with skeletal Class III (median age 9 years; 56% females) received treatment with a maxillary expander and facemask. These subjects were matched with two control groups: one comprising an equal number of untreated Class III individuals, and the other consisting of untreated Class I controls. Cephalograms were analysed, and both children and their parents self-administered the Child Perceptions Questionnaire, Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire and Family Impact Scale.

resultsTreated Class III cases showed significant increases in the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airway width (p ≤ 0.033), with greater changes in the nasopharyngeal width compared to untreated Class III cases (p = 0.040). Compared to untreated Class III and Class I groups, treated Class III cases exhibited reduced mandibular prominence and sagittal skeletal Class, increased overjet, overbite, vertical facial dimension, and greater retroclination and retrusion of mandibular incisors (p ≤ 0.011). Prior to and following orthodontic treatment, Class III cases reported a lower quality of life across all dimensions compared to Class I controls (p ≤ 0.032). An increase in maxillary anterior movement and oropharyngeal width correlated with a decrease in functional limitations reported by children (r = -0.411-(-0.413)); (p ≤ 0.022).

conclusionMaxillary expansion and protraction in prepubertal Class III children can enhance upper airways width, and children associate these improvements with a reduction in functional limitations.

Indexed as

Malocclusion, Angle Class IIIPalatal Expansion TechniqueQuality of LifeCase-Control StudiesCephalometryChildExtraoral Traction AppliancesFemaleHumansMaleNasopharynxOropharynxSurveys and QuestionnairesVertical Dimensionairway managementinterceptive orthodonticsmaxillary expansion

Identifiers

PMID40249474
PMCPMC13139985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.